I Want to Carry a Rifle for a Job Again
To bask the CBBC Newsround website at its best you will need to have JavaScript turned on.
The gun laws in America are making headlines over again later 2 attacks in Texas and Ohio.
In America, it's not unusual for people to have a gun. Virtually every developed tin can own or acquit one.
It is seen as a person's basic right to be immune to exercise this.
Getty Images
In America, it'south not unusual for people to ain a gun. Almost every developed can ain or bear ane
That'southward because when the land was founded, the right to buy and carry a gun was written into the constitution, which is a list of bones rules that a land is based on.
The only reasons that someone might non be immune to have a gun would be if they are a bedevilled criminal, have a mental wellness illness or if they are not a Us citizen.
These rules have been in place since 1791, so buying and owning a gun is something that American people have been allowed to do for a very long time.
Still, rules on gun buying do vary between unlike US states and in that location are special laws to forestall people from having guns in certain places like in - or near - schools.
In some states, the rules are less strict than in others. For case, in the state of Nevada, people do not have to tell anyone that they own a gun.
In that location are as well different rules for which different types of guns people are immune to ain and - again - these vary from state to state.
How is information technology different to the UK?
When incidents happen in the Usa, you might have questions like, how was the person responsible for the incident able to have a gun to do this? Is information technology possible for someone to do the same affair in the Great britain?
To enjoy the CBBC Newsround website at its best you will need to accept JavaScript turned on.
The rules are very different in the U.k.. In fact, the Britain has some of the strictest gun laws in the globe.
In order to ain a gun in the UK, a person needs to have a special document called a licence, which is issued by the police force.
You lot demand one of these to buy ammunition as well.
Certain guns are completely against the law, and you could non purchase or own them unless you had special permission from the regime.
Christopher Furlong
The rules for gun ownership in the U.k. are much stricter than they are in the US
The principal deviation between the rules in the US and in the UK is that people in the U.k. exercise non have a fundamental right to have a gun.
A person has to take a very good reason to have i - and the law take to agree with it.
At that place are also much stricter checks done before a person is allowed to have a gun, which aim to make sure that individual is not dangerous.
Many believe that strict rules like this are why mass shootings, like in Texas and Ohio, are extremely rare in the UK.
What is the debate in America nearly?
There is a lot of disagreement in America most whether or not the electric current gun laws are correct.
Getty Images
People in America have protested for the gun laws to be inverse
Those who think the rules need to exist inverse say that shootings like the contempo attacks could exist prevented if the rules about owning guns were stricter.
Many say at that place should exist more rules about the type of guns that people are immune to take and more than strict groundwork checks to make certain that dangerous people aren't able to become their hands on weapons.
They say that in countries where people aren't allowed to deport guns, fewer people are killed each year by these weapons - then, therefore, America should change its rules.
Getty Images
The right to bear artillery in the US is written into the rules of the country
Nonetheless, people who don't want stricter gun rules say that it is their right by police to be able to take one.
They say they want to be able to employ them to protect themselves if they demand to.
They as well say that if guns were banned then criminals would all the same have them anyway and ordinary people wouldn't be able to defend themselves if they needed to.
To enjoy the CBBC Newsround website at its best you will demand to have JavaScript turned on.
What will happen now?
Every fourth dimension there is a serious set on involving guns, the arguments nigh the land'due south gun laws start again.
Fifty-fifty if a president in America idea the rules should be changed and the gun laws needed to be made stricter, he or she tin can't but change the rules on their own. They would need a lot of support from other politicians, who often don't concord.
Barack Obama, who was president of the U.s. before Donald Trump, said that not being able to deal with gun control was the greatest frustration of his time in the chore.
But the current president Donald Trump has said he supports gun owners' rights.
Getty Images
The US president has said he will "never, ever infringe on the right of the people to go along and behave arms"
"Permit me brand a simple promise," Mr Trump said in April 2017. "I will never, ever borrow on the right of the people to keep and conduct arms."
So people right across America cannot concord about what should happen - and it doesn't wait like they are going to hold any time shortly.
Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/41483003
0 Response to "I Want to Carry a Rifle for a Job Again"
Post a Comment